Extending Finite Memory Determinacy to Multiplayer Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
We provide several techniques to extend finite memory determinacy from some restricted class of games played on a finite graph to a larger class. As a particular example, we study energy parity games. First we show that under some general conditions the finite memory determinacy of a class of two-player win/lose games played on finite graphs implies the existence of a Nash equilibrium built from finite memory strategies for the corresponding class of multi-player multi-outcome games. This generalizes a previous result by Brihaye, De Pril and Schewe. Then we investigate adding additional constraints to the winning conditions, in a way that generalizes the move from parity to bounded energy parity games. We prove that under some conditions, this preserves finite memory determinacy. We show that bounded energy parity games and unbounded energy parity games are equivalent, and thus obtain a new proof of finite memory determinacy for energy parity games. Our proof yields significantly improved bounds on the memory required compared to the original one by Chatterjee and Doyen. We then apply our main theorem to show that multi-player multi-outcome energy parity games have finite memory Nash equilibria. Our proofs are generally constructive, that is, provide upper bounds for the memory required, as well as algorithms to compute the relevant winning strategies.
منابع مشابه
Banach-Mazur Games with Simple Winning Strategies
We discuss several notions of ‘simple’ winning strategies for Banach-Mazur games on graphs, such as positional strategies, move-counting or length-counting strategies, and strategies with a memory based on finite appearance records (FAR). We investigate classes of Banach-Mazur games that are determined via these kinds of winning strategies. Banach-Mazur games admit stronger determinacy results ...
متن کاملEquilibria in Quantitative Reachability Games
In this paper, we study turn-based quantitative multiplayer non zero-sum games played on finite graphs with reachability objectives. In this framework each player aims at reaching his own goal as soon as possible. We prove existence of finite-memory Nash (resp. secure) equilibria in multiplayer (resp. two-player) games.
متن کاملFrom winning strategy to Nash equilibrium
Game theory is usually considered applied mathematics, but a few game-theoretic results, such as Borel determinacy, were developed by mathematicians for mathematics in a broad sense. These results usually state determinacy, i.e. the existence of a winning strategy in games that involve two players and two outcomes saying who wins. In a multi-outcome setting, the notion of winning strategy is ir...
متن کاملPositional Determinacy of Games with Infinitely Many Priorities
We study two-player games of infinite duration that are played on finite or infinite game graphs. A winning strategy for such a game is positional if it only depends on the current position, and not on the history of the play. A game is positionally determined if, from each position, one of the two players has a positional winning strategy. The theory of such games is well studied for winning c...
متن کاملPostinal Determinacy of Games with Infinitely Many Priorities
We study two-player games of infinite duration that are played on finite or infinite game graphs. A winning strategy for such a game is positional if it only depends on the current position, and not on the history of the play. A game is positionally determined if, from each position, one of the two players has a positional winning strategy. The theory of such games is well studied for winning c...
متن کامل